|
Epidemiology and Pathologic Precursors
Relatively few large epidemiologic studies have evaluated breast
cancer risk factors according to the ER status of the tumor. Age-specific
incidence rates of breast cancer vary according to ER status: the
age incidence curve for ER+ tumors slows substantially at menopause
whereas the rate continues to rise steadily for ER- tumors. Endogenous
hormonal variables (menarche, parity, age at first birth, body mass
index) have been evaluated in several recent studies. Reproductive
factors have tended to be most strongly related to ER+ tumors among
postmenopausal women differences for BMI have been inconsistent
and differences in premenopausal women have infrequently been addressed.
In two previous studies, family history was more strongly associated
with ER- tumors although in a third this was true only when relatives
were diagnosed before age 45. This may in part be due to the finding
that while BRCA1-associated tumors are for the most part ER-, BRCA2-associated
tumors are often ER+. Physical activity was related in comparable
manner to both ER+ and ER- tumors in one study.
Although increasing evidence suggests that estrogen plus progestin
hormone replacement therapy increases breast cancer risk more than
estrogen use alone, no previous study to our knowledge has evaluated
these relationships by ER status of the tumor. Similarly, although
proliferative benign breast disease is a well-established risk factor
for breast cancer, the relation between ER status of both the benign
lesion and the subsequent invasive cancer has not previously been
addressed. Circulating levels of estradiol in postmenopausal women
have been consistently and strongly associated with an increased
risk of breast cancer though the relation to ER status is unknown.
Plasma testosterone, prolactin and insulin-like growth factor I
(IGF-1) have been positively associated with breast cancer risk,
but no previous study has reported these relations by ER status
of the tumor. Thus there has been little progress in defining the
risk factors related specifically to the development of ER- breast
cancer.
OBJECTIVES
We propose to draw on the existing data from the ongoing Nurses'
Health Study (G. Colditz, PI. CA 87969) and sub-studies that relates
histologic subtypes of benign breast disease to subsequent risk
of breast cancer in the cohort (G. Colditz PI CA 46475) and that
evaluate several endogenous hormones in relation to breast cancer
risk (S. Hankinson PI, CA49449). We will reevaluate existing data
to relate exposure information to risk of ER- tumors to determine
if risk factors differ between these subtypes of breast cancer.
Specifically we will test the following hypotheses
Markers of endogenous hormones (e.g., age at first birth, parity,
age at menarche, physical activity) and endogenous hormones themselves
(i.e., estradiol, testosterone) are more strongly related to ER+
tumors while family history of breast cancer and IGF-I are more
strongly related to ER- tumors.
Use of estrogen alone increases risk of ER+ tumors, but estrogen
plus progestin promotes cell division and increases risk of ER-
tumors (i.e. the proportion of ER- tumors is higher among E plus
P users compared to E alone).
ER+ benign lesions increase the risk preferentially of ER+ tumors
and ER- benign lesions increase the risk preferentially of ER- tumors
COLLABORATORS
Graham A. Colditz, M.D., Dr. P.H.-Dr. Colditz is a Professor
of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
and a Professor of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health
(http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/facres/cldtz.html). He is the Principal
Investigator of the Nurses' Health Study. He will serve as a co-investigator
on Project 1. Email: Graham.colditz@channing.harvard.edu
Susan E. Hankinson, Ph.D.-Dr. Hankinson is an Associate
Professor of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical
School and an Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Harvard School
of Public Health. She is a co-investigator of the Nurses' Health
Study. She is an expert in the epidemiology of breast cancer. She
will serve as a co-investigator on Project 1. Email: Sue.hankinson@channing.harvard.edu
Stuart J. Schnitt, M.D.-Dr. Schnitt is Associate Professor
of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical
School and Associate Director of Anatomic Pathology, Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center. He is an expert in breast cancer pathology.
He will serve as a co-investigator on Project 1 and a collaborator
on Project 4. Email: Sschnitt@bidmc.harvard.edu
DATA
The Nurses' Health Study cohort was defined when 121,700 women
returned a mailed questionnaire in 1976. The study population consisted
of female, registered nurses, 30 to 55 years of age at that time,
who were identified in 1972 as married and residing in one of eleven
states in the U.S. by the state boards of nursing and the American
Nurses' Association. The cohort is followed through biennial mailed
questionnaires and document breast cancers and other illnesses by
medical records within cores of the ongoing program project. The
National Death Index is searched to complete the follow-up of mortality.
As of the 1998 follow-up cycle, participation has remained >90%.
In 1989-90, blood samples were collected from 32,826 members of
the cohort. These samples were centrifuged, separated into plasma,
RBC, and buffy coat components and have been archived in nitrogen
freezers since collection. A large number of nested case-control
studies have been conducted evaluating biomarker/breast cancer relationships.
USEFUL LINKS
Nurses'
Health Study
SEER
ACS
Cancer Statistics
[back to top]
|